Quick – name three key elements of what Christians mean when they say “Communion.”
Regardless of your faith background – religious or non-religious, Christian or not – chances are you probably thought of at least “bread” and “wine.” You might have also heard of the phrases “body of Christ” and “blood of Christ” in connection with Communion.

If you’ve been to some kind of mass or church service that involved communion, you’ve probably experienced it as a rather somber affair. Even upbeat contemporary evangelical services tend to play somber hymns during their once-a-month communion services.
I remember when I first encountered Communion when I was probably about twelve years old. It was in a small town in deeply Islamic Yemen, at a Christmas Eve mass conducted by the Sisters of Light, the Mother Teresa group. I was a young Hindu boy then, but my mother had a deep friendship with several of the Mother Teresa sisters, since many of them were from the same part of India as my mother. So, we attended this service at the house where the sisters lived.
A Catholic priest drove in from the big capital city, hundreds of miles away. Since it was illegal in Yemen to have non-Islamic religious gatherings, the mass had to be held in secret, in a room shaded with thick curtains so that the neighbors wouldn’t report us to the police. When time came for communion, I remember that my mother and I were told to stay in our chairs, as we were not allowed to take the bread and the wine. I remember hearing the priest intone the somber words, “this is the body of Christ,” and all the nuns bowing their heads and crunching away on odd-looking whitish discs, and then the somber words, “this is the blood of Christ,” followed by equally somber sips from a simple but mysterious goblet.
I vividly remember being shocked by the thought of people actually eating the body of a dead person and drinking that corpse’s blood.
What kind of crazy people were these Christians, eating the body of their “God” person?
And now, almost two decades later, through many Communion services where I have partaken of the bread and wine (grape juice, actually) as a practicing and devout Christian, it is still a mystery to me that Christians regularly “eat” the body of Christ and “drink” the blood of Christ.
What about you? What do you think? Doesn’t this seem rather strange and uncomfortably cannibalistic, perhaps bloodthirsty even?
And, besides, so what?
Maybe you’re itching to tell me about all the great theological significances of this new covenant, about the echoes of the sacrificial Lamb, and that it’s all about Jesus giving his body and blood for ME.
Maybe you’re itching to assure me that it’s not the literal body and blood of Christ, that the Catholics are dead wrong, that it’s actually a symbolic token of the new covenant, not to be taken literally as us chewing on the bloody body of Jesus at the foot of the cross.
So what?
So Jesus gave his blood for you and broke his body for me. So we get to go to heaven. Someday.
So what?
So you drink and eat, and you remember him dying and bleeding, and you symbolically remember this new covenant, and you sing a quiet song to yourself.
Maybe you sit there and try to make yourself feel guilty about last night’s party, or you try to feel remorse about not being a “good witness” at work.
So what?
Or, maybe you’re just hungry for lunch. It is an appetizer after all, especially if you haven’t had breakfast yet.
And, why do we call it “communion” anyway? Where’s the “communal” part?
What difference does it make?
Perhaps there’s something deeper about communion – something mysterious and dangerous, something that won’t let us sit there with just deep thoughts about it, but something that demands reckless action.
Perhaps Jesus intended it to be a ritual that resonated with the deep-rooted Jewish belief that blood contains life, hence the law against eating meat that still has blood in it. Maybe Jesus intended communion to be a celebration of the giving and sharing of His life-blood.
Perhaps Jesus intended it to be a reminder that he is alive, not dead, that following him means more than belief in ideas and doctrines, that following him really means biting into his life, intimately seeking true nourishment from Him.
Perhaps Jesus intended it to be the celebration of the Kingdom here, now, for, as he said, it is at hand.
Perhaps, Jesus intended it to be something you do regularly with other people, not just alone in your pew once a month with your little plastic cup of wholesale grape-juice-from-concentrate.
Perhaps those other people we invite to celebrate communion with us don’t necessarily have to be Christians.
Perhaps we should celebrate communion every time we eat and drink, not just once a month.
Perhaps the saints of old were on to something when they coined the word “Communion” to describe this ritual – a word with overtones of vulnerability and intimacy. Perhaps it really is an intimate act of relationship with God, more than just a guilt-trip, more than a bizarre cannibalistic holdover from sacrificial days.
Perhaps the Catholics are right after all, perhaps there really is something deep and mysterious and supernaturally transforming, and perhaps even something divinely dangerous, about the act of communion.
Perhaps communion is the beginning of a recklessly interactive relationship with Jesus, not a feel-guilty, morose sing-along about poor dead Jesus up on that tree, all dead and broken so that we can feel righteous about ourselves. Instead, it is a relationship that challenges us - a relationship that is strikingly uncomfortable, vulnerable, intense, humbling, and one that makes us bite and swallow and taste and breathe His living presence into our continually wrestling souls.
The Jews quarreled with each other, saying: How can this man give us his flesh to eat? Jesus said to them: Truly truly I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has life everlasting, and I will raise him up on the last day. For my flesh is the true food, and my blood is the true drink. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood stays in me, and I in him. As the living father sent me and I live through the father, so he who eats me will also live through me. This is the bread which came down from heaven; not as our fathers ate and died, he who eats this bread will live forever.
All this he said as he taught in the synagogue in Capernaum. Then many of his disciples hearing him said: This is a hard saying. Who can listen to it?
~ John

March 23rd, 2007 at 5:03 pm
Hari,
Roman Catholics, historically, believe that the wafer and the wine ACTUALLY “transubstantiate” into the literal body & blood of Christ. That’s what Protestors, er, Protestants, find so appaling–believing that Christ sacrificed himself ONCE for all, not over and over again.
AMERICAN CATHOLICs, as of about 1966, started using, not “transubstantiation,” signifing an actual change of substance, but, rather, “trans-signification.” The wine and bread change their significance in the mind/soul of those who truly believe. In part this is somewhat accepted by American Catholics at large.
Basically, it is a mote item, having been supplanted by more serious issues– 60% drop in priesthood, need to new sources of clergy from Lutherans, Methodists, and Episcopalians. Also, Clergy morality and homosexuality has come to fore recently, casting shadow on all and any good done in the past by RC Clergy. It’s a mess.
So what!?
From a Christian point of view, it’s a matter of integrity. We don’t seem to have much anymore.
From a secular point of view, it merely confirms that the Christian faith is a sham–something to be aspired to, but never achievable. It has become a matter of TRUST. If you can’t trust your priest, how can you believe what he says!?
In some circles where I have dared to walk I have enjoyed 2-3 hour communion services where whole meals were eaten, friendship and stories were shared. It was fun.
At my present church our new pastor has truly opened Communion from a time of somber introspection to a period of communial gathering together, allowing time to catch up, share stories, and enjoy one another as a Body of Christ. It’s no longer a derge as much as it is a cool party, with the bread & wine being served as or’d heurves.
I think I’ll stay.
March 23rd, 2007 at 6:36 pm
Gary, I think my response to that is still “so what?”
I still think the fight over “transubstantiation” is silly, and I don’t think it’s about “once for all” versus “over and over again”. So, what if Catholics are sacrificing Christ over and over again? Protestants do pretty much the same thing every time they sanctimoniously proclaim Christ’s name in public only to ironically defile it just as publicly when their hidden hypocrisies come to light.
It seems like Protestants are so hung up on Christ’s sacrifice that they miss the point about Christ’s living presence. Communion becomes a way of continuing to keep Christ dead, where he’s safely under control, rather than exploring the dangerous adventure of true communion with a living God.
I’m glad to hear about communion services where it’s truly celebrated and in community!! I would love to see such communions happen more regularly and outside the walls of a church
July 7th, 2007 at 9:17 am
Hari,
I want to share my personal journey from my upbringing from a devout Roman Catholic, loving home to now. I grew up with an appreciation for the sacrifice of Christ’s work on the cross. The loving, mysterious sacrifice and suffering that He endured for me. I fully understood His work when as a teenager I began studying the Bible. As a 14 year old I went to scripture as my guide. Pure and simple, I believed and still do that the words I read are holy writ. Based on that context Hari, I went to scripture to answer gnawing questions that I had surrounding my “communion” experience as it was presented to me all my life. I asked God to help me see His Truth. Funny, sometimes when we want to seek truth we don’t actually believe that we’ll find it. My friends and adult friends people believed I thought and processed as an older person! very similar to my daughters and especially Ella!. I asked God and God delivered. He made scriptures pop out to me in an incredibly clear way. My journey was continuing. You see I attended Mass every morning before High School. I walked past my church every morning so I decided to start my day off worshipping with others at 7am. I lived this life Hari. This was my life for many years. I guess I am engaging you because of the comment you made..” once for all” versus “over and over again”. I lived what you are commenting about. It wasn’t a thought or an idea of something I theorized. You didn’t experience what you are commenting about like me. I am sharing with you actual, personal and real events. My story will hopefully give you a perspective and an understanding of others like me. My goal is not to win an argument, change your mind or defend anything I truly believe. My goal is to share with you what happened to me and you can digest it and decide if knowing what happened to me has a place with all your other thinking.
My questions were answered when I began a study of Christ’s “last supper”, His death and ressurection. Using scripture as my guide I concluded that sacrificing Christ over and over again signified an error in the communion “Mass” services that I had attended for years. I was shocked, saddened and afraid of what else I would discover. I was also angry. Being angry and judgemental is never a filter to seek the truth. It just muddies the water. It took me weeks to process the scripture that I read. I also had many conversations with my priest and a local Pastor from a non Catholic Church. After weeks of wanting to understand Christ’s ultimate sacrifice for me I reliquished my anger and my desire to “explain” it away using human terms that my religion used to explain Christ’s work on the Cross. Both Priest and Pastor said …let the scripture answer your questions.
I went back to scripture without being defensive of my religious and let the scripture say it all.
Romans 6:9-10
For we know that since Christ was raised from the dead, He cannot die; death no longer has mastery over Him. The death he died, He died to sin once for all; but the life He lives, he lives for God
I am not interested in sharing my take on how we as believers in Christ should or shouldn’t celebrate/remember Christ’s last supper. There is nothing wrong with doing it once a month or every nite around the kitchen table. Christ said..Do this in remembrance of Me… The variety we see is how different communities express Christ’s request of remembering Him. That is a beautiful expression of the greater picture God has for us.
The important and central point of this discussion is the statement…the Once for all part. That is the defining point for me.
I still sense a lot of disappointment and perhaps some hidden stuff that you are still processing Hari. I will pray for God to comfort you as He comforts me in our search. Seek and you will find!
My journey is about living as real and authentic as I can, through the power that resurrected Christ. In doing so and relying on Him, I can love, care for and be the hands of Jesus in this broken hurting world. Do I mess up? All the time! Does Christ forgive and allow me to try again…yes. Because of that truth, I can forgive my former employer who hurt me and my family. God also gives me compassion for those who don’t live up to the name “Christian”, or my expectations of them. I have a responsibility to seek out those blind spots in my own life, to live a life of reconciliation and service to others.
That is my prayer.
Much love to you Hari, press hard after Christ…He won’t disappoint!! Enjoy your reckless passionate journey.
Vitalina
July 7th, 2007 at 9:42 am
Thanks Vit,
Again, though, my point has nothing to do with “once for all” versus “over and over again” - I just think that perhaps “transsubstantiation” may have an element of truth behind it. Perhaps there really is something divinely life-affirming and life-giving about Communion that we miss by seeing it as purely about the DEATH of Christ, whether we think that death was “once for all” or whether we think that death happens “over and over again”. I’d rather focus on the life-giving aspect of it, that’s my point
July 7th, 2007 at 8:15 pm
Hari,
Who ever said it was purely about the Death of Christ? I can’t remember one service that I have ever heard that. Jesus said…do this in remembrance of me…He broke the bread, which represented His body…we pause and consider that…then He shows us the cup…which represented the blood He shed for us…we stop and think of that act of love for us…How many times have you heard about the life that we gained through Christ’s death at Chapel of the Cross? need I say from my husband…He affirmed our new life in Christ. Your experience at our Church doesn’t match your disdain for it now…Where did you hear about death? Wasn’t at Chapel. I venture to say you didn’t hear it College Church either…so where? If you think the solemness of a service means that people are concentrating on Christ’s death..perhaps there is room for that.But…it is rarely left there…We rejoice in the Life that His death gave to us…It is a celebration.
Your comment about about whether we think that His death was a once for all or not isn’t what you want to focus on ..well I tend to disagree. It is all about the Cross, it is all about the death, resurrection and the work of reconciliation. You speak of doing the work for the Kingdom. Who are you serving? Whose Kingdom is it? Who is the King? If He is the King and we need to decide who King Jesus is….
think about it..
Vit
July 7th, 2007 at 8:22 pm
“It is all about the Cross, it is all about the death, resurrection and the work of reconciliation.”
You are making my point